2DARK天文志

The observed cosmic acceleration today could be due to an unknown energy
component (dark energy), or a modification to general relativity (modified
gravity). If dark energy models and modified gravity models are required to
predict the same cosmic expansion history H(z), they will predict different
growth rate for cosmic large scale structure, $f_g(z)=d\ln \delta/d\ln a
(\delta=(\rho_m-\bar{\rho_m})/\bar{\rho_m})$, a is the cosmic scale factor). If
gravity is not modified, the measured H(z) leads to a unique prediction for
$f_g(z)$, $f_g^H(z)$. Comparing $f_g^H(z)$ with the measured $f_g(z)$ provides a
transparent and straightforward test of gravity. We show that a simple $\chi^2$
test provides a general figure-of-merit for our ability to distinguish between
dark energy and modified gravity given the measured H(z) and $f_g(z)$. We study a
magnitude-limited NIR galaxy redshift survey covering >10,000 (deg)^2 and the
redshift range of 0.5<z<2. The resultant data can be divided into 7 redshift
bins, and yield the measurement of H(z) to the accuracy of 1-2% via baryon
acoustic oscillation measurements, and $f_g(z)$ to the accuracy of a few percent
via the measurement of redshift space distortions and the bias factor which
describes how light traces mass. We find that if the H(z) data are fit by both
a DGP gravity model and an equivalent dark energy model that predict the same
expansion history, a survey area of 11,931 (deg)^2 is required to rule out the
DGP gravity model at the 99.99% confidence level. It is feasible for such a
galaxy redshift survey to be carried out by the next generation space missions
from NASA and ESA, and it will revolutionize our understanding of the universe
by differentiating between dark energy and modified gravity.